Shrine of Sharifah Rogayah


The Concept of Keramat


 
Keramat come in different forms. It could be as grand as a well-decorated shrine; It could be a piece of rock wrapped in yellow cloth;
Or it could be a grave even nobody was buried underneath it. Most commonly it is believed to be the tomb(s) of some pious holy men

¡@

Why people worship at keramat?

(Source: No.1-26 Academic Session 1995-1997, Department of Malay Studies, NUS)

The term "keramat" in Malay is derived from the Arabic term "karamah", which refers specifically to the wali (plural. waliya in Arabic), a close friend of God (Allah), or a pious person. It may be applied to the living saint (sheikh) but, more often than not, it is applied to the dead.

In the Malay tradition, keramat-worship is a legacy of early Sufi Islam or Islamic mysticism (tasauf) which played an important role in the spread of mystical teachings through Islamic movements (Subhan 1960). The spread of keramat-worship, however, was viewed by some fundamentalists as having the tendency to divert Muslims from the mainstream Islamic movement, for the keramat movement directly placed emphasis on saint-worship rather than the true teaching of Islam per se. Others do not necessarily hold the same view.

The underlying factor which had contributed to the popularity of saint-worship among the Malays in Malaysia, Singapore and other South East countries was that they had great regards for the pious one, such as the sheikh or the leader of a Sufi order (tarikat), not only as a repository of esoteric religious knowledge but also as an extraordinary individual endowed with baraka (or berkat in Malay), that is, semi-divine power acquired through religious devotion and piety. Some of them were believed to have achieved the wali or saint status and possess wonder-making capabilities or magical power. Ordinary Muslims regard the wali as a particular kind of friend of God, one whose special closeness to divinity mediated between ordinary faithful people and that all-powerful and distant deity. They turn to such living saints for advices in legal disputes or as to the success or failure of an enterprise or as intercessor for the sick or to get a child or to remove blight or plague or confound enemies (Winstedt 1925:47). Thus, a cult of saints which centred around the graves of deceased and, sometimes living men and women, grew up in traditional Malay society and served as the main focal points for laymen to become formally acquainted with Islam.

The deceased Malay datuks are believed to manifest themselves in the form of invisible spirits in particular localities, whose duty it is to ensure the general well-being of the residents who worship them. To the devotees, apart from the sheikhs and saints, persons who have done good deeds and contributed to the peace and prosperity of the community may also be remembered and honoured as keramat after their demise. In actual fact, the concept of keramat, or karamah in Arabic, has its origin in pre-Islamic Arabian tradition (Serjeant 1981). The term begins to incorporate the concept of holy persons such as the sheikhs and Sufi masters, after Islam was instituted in the 6th or 7th century A.D. Epistemologically speaking, therefore, the concept of keramat and its practice claim no orthodoxy at all in Islamic origin.

As keramat-worship grew in importance in the archipelago, Islamic and pre-Islamic notions of divinity and the supernatural and superhuman came to dominate the Malay belief system. It is therefore not surprising to find that keramat objects range not only from holy men and women as well as their graves and relics but also to groups of boulders, huge trees, tigers, dead shamans, warriors, kings (Winstedt 1924), and legendary accounts like Puteri Mahsuri, Pahlawan Hitam, and the Wells of the Seven Sisters on Pulau Langkawi become important vehicles for the development of keramat (Ismail 1990; Braddron Asiqin 1988) and the sanctification of its natural environment.


Two forms of Keramat

Based on the above discussion, keramat in Malay may thus exist in two forms: material and non-material, or kasar and halus (Greetz 1969). In its material form, a keramat is "the bodily tenement or receptacle containing the soul of the departed saint or ancestor of the village" (Skeat 1984:673). In non-material form, keramat means "sanctity" and "miraculous power" attributed to the soul of the departed saint or ancestral guardian of the village. In some cases, the concept of keramat is used to refer to living saints. Under these circumstances, the material and non-material aspects of the keramat may have to take into consideration this aspect Malay sainthood. It is generally used adjectively, being applied to both animate and inanimate objects, including men, animals, plants, stones, earth mounds, whirlpools, and such like natural phenomena.
¡@



Figure 1. Simplified classification of Keramats in Malay Folk Belief


Keramat-worship is not encouraged among Muslims

Because of this tendency, Islamic theologians and jurists were influenced by popular consensus to recognize saints and perhaps to acknowledge their miracles. However, they did not cordon pilgrimages to saints' graves and the practice of cultic activities there. This is because Islam preaches the existence of one God, and all pseudo-plural deities are non-entities and have to be repudiated, so that Muslims should have no other gods but God alone. The concept of the one and the only God (tauhid) is embodied in the Islamic confession of faith (kalimah syahadat)" 'La illaha illa Allah, Muhammad rasul Allah" (There is no god but God alone, Muhammad is the messenger of God). Any attempt on the part of believers to associate God with other pseudo-divinity is labeled "syirik". This in fact forms an important basis for devout Muslims' objection to keramat-worship.

In principle, therefore, keramat-worship is not encouraged among Muslims. However, some Malays justify their belief in keramat by saying that they are making efforts (ikhtiar) permitted by God to bring them blessing, or that they are using an intermediary (wasilah) in approaching Allah. To their mind, humans are frail and unworthy to be in direct contact with God; they think therefore it is right and proper to seek a holy person as an intermediary to act on their behalf, so as to bring about immediate and positive result. This should not come as a surprise since Malays had long conceived of their ancestors as holy men richly endowed with the power to intercede with Heaven on their behalf before the coming of Islam. It is not surprising that, in religious rituals, some Malays still prefer to Allah in the name of the Prophet, saints and other people who possess the baraka or karamah (blessing) from God. The belief in the efficacy of this ritual is still reflected in the popular practice of some Malays who visit shrines or tombs of saints to pray and to seek the blessing and intercession of the holy persons buried there. As time goes by, these places become sacred in the eyes of worshippers and they eventually become keramats where vows are made and offerings given (Mohd Nor 1985).

 
1. This Datok Keramat was built under the shelter of a strangely shaped old Banyan Tree that is believed to be very sacred
2. Rumour has it that on this tree, many people hung themselves to meet their ends;
3. But what makes it as a keramat is the belief of a Holy lady buried at the tree;
4. The intriguing legend, however, is that on the back of the shrine there is an oracle "eye" that can telepathically communicate with us
Some devotee said the eye will "blink" to you as an acknowledgment of promising your request will be granted when you pray to it
Hence it is nicked as the "eye" shrine. Supernatural or superstitious?


Characteristic of Keramat worship

Despite Islam's position as the centre of Malay society in the archipelago, fundamental indigenous beliefs prior to the process of Islamization were still retained by majority of the Malays in the past. This is especially true in the case of keramat worship. As asserted by Walter Skeat (1984: 61), "although officially the religious centre of the village community is the mosque, there is usually in every small district a holy place known as the 'keramat', at which vows are paid on special occasions, and which is invested with a very high degree of reverence and sanctity."

Keramat worship in the Malay society takes various forms. Based on Figure 1 above, these can be classified into five categories:

  1. Worship at the graves of persons said to have attained sainthood (wali) while alive or posthumously;
  2. Worship at the graves of kings, magicians, founders of settlements, and sometimes those of obscure and dubious history who are also referred as keramat;
  3. Belief in living saints and wonder-workings (keramat hidup);
  4. Belief in keramat objects possessed of magical and wonderful powers; and
  5. Belief in animal keramat (Mohd Taib 1967: 188-189)

The belief and subsequent worship of such keramat entail feelings of awe and reverence for the objects of worship. They are believed to be pregnant with supernatural powers, able to fulfill one's wishes when in need or incur calamities when infracted.

The last three types of keramat savours much of the indigenous belief in the notion of 'semangat' and nature worship. Things or animals with extraordinary or peculiar physical characteristics were revered as keramat. For instance, 'Gajah keramat' (Ghost Elephant) has a stunted tusk or a shrunken foot, while 'Rimau Kermat' (Ghost Tiger) has a shrunken foot. Both are believed to be guardian spirits of some shrines in the village.

Although grave keramat are generally assumed to have Islamic sanctity, their authenticity in relation to Islam can be doubted. Often, Islamic, Persian and Arabic titles like Habib, Syed, Sheikh and Shah are spun around spurious personalities to don the keramat with a religious aura. For example, Keramat Iskandar Shah at Fort Canning is actually the grave of a Hindu king who founded a dynasty in the region. The Muslim name and grave are perhaps used to immortalize awe and reverence for him. Moreover, the rituals involved at the grave keramat resemble that of ancestor worship which is certainly incompatible with Islam.

One common characteristic which can be detected in all the keramat is the association of the color yellow with them. Originally a royal color, the introduction of the notion of Keramat to the Malay folks saw the transfer of this sacred color to the latter. Some would argue that this was done to Islamize the practice of keramat worship. However, this argument raises some doubts, as the color popularly associated with Islam is in fact green, not yellow. Hence the use of yellow is suspected to have the purpose of creating an aura of sanctity related to the Malay divine kingship, not an effort of Islamize keramat worship.

 
This is the Kusu Keramat on the hill top of Kusu island. It attracts many devotees to come here to pray and make wishes

 
1. When a big wish is granted, the devotee would have to come back tie a big rig of a stone in red color cloth (plastic bag) on the tree
2 - 4. General wishes that were granted require only a small yellow ribbon to be tied on the nearby tree as a gesture of gratitude


Rituals of keramat-worship

Rituals involved in the first two types of keramat are similar. Underlying this form of worship is the Islamic cult of saints and the belief that although the saints are buried, "yet he lives and receives the worshippers' homage, hears their prayers and intercedes on their behalf" (Subhan 1960:334).

Worshipping at a grave keramat entails making a vow ('pasang niat') and fulfilling it when the request is met. A votary would pray and request to be assisted in a particular project or be relieved from a difficulty. If this request is met, he would then fulfill the vow made earlier in the form of sacrifice or offerings. To remind the votary of his vow, stones are tied to white or yellow strings and are hung anywhere near the keramat. It is said that white cloth represent moderate requests while yellow cloth significes extravagant ones. The bigger the request is, the bigger the yellow cloth will be. Vows can be made anywhere but it is believed to be more effective if made at the tomb. To make it more concrete, vows should be made with a 'seru' (verbal proclamation), for example, "Kalau hasil niat saya ini Datok, saya nazar nak sedkah pisang setandan di makam Datok" ("If my request is fulfilled, I will donate a bunch of bananas to your mausoleum"). Some elements of ancestor worship can be tranced here in the term 'Datok', which literally means 'grandfather' or 'orang tua'.

Bananas are the Malay folk's favourite in making offerings. Beside being unseasonal, bananas are also cheap and affordable to the Malays who were generally peasants. Red colored eggs and yellow glutinous rice are also offered. Yellow glutinous rice is believed to be a symbol of unity. It remains ubiquitous, even today, in Malay functions.

Beside bananas and yellow glutinous rice, other offerings and sacrifice are also made. These vary, depending on the type of request and the affordability of the votary. Some of these offerings are: building mausoleum for the keramat, donating to upkeep the shrine, promising to perform the haj, and dedicating an animal to the keramat.

Requests normally deal with personal matters and they differ among individuals. However, what is distinctly similar in these requests is that they relate to immediate and local needs of the Malay folks. Some of the more popular requests include the following: the desire for progeny, the healing of incurable illnesses, the winning of local disputes, the prevention of calamities, and the solving of matrimonial problems.


Case Study

An interview with a 82 years old Tok Hamid (not his real name) gave an insight on the practice of keramat worship in the past and the reasons behind it.

According to Tok Hamid, although he and most of his folks were Muslims, their cultural practices were still Hinduistic and incompatible with Islam. Citing the gifts offered at the keramat, Tok Hamid affirmed that the Malays in his generation did believe that the food offered (usually bananas and yellow glutinous rice) to the keramat would be consumed by the keramat concerned. Indeed, this savours of indigenous belief in 'semangat', where deficiency in vital force is believed to be replenished by diet. IN the case of nature and ancestor worship, food is offered to appease spirits. With regards to the grave-type keramat, Tok Hamid reveals that some are not even graves. He said:

There would be some people who want to gain some benefits from the villagers' worship of keramat. So they take two tombstones, put them at a secluded place and call it a 'keramat'. They Malay folks in the past were very trustful. They believed in everything. Thus, when someone called something a keramat, and incidentally somebody's wish is granted from worshipping at the keramat, others would also believe in the sanctity of the keramat.

Indeed, what can be deduced from here is that not only is keramat worship incompatible with Islam, but it has also been abused to serve some individuals' vested interested.

Tok Hamid also pointed out the reasons behind the prevalence of keramat worship among the Malay community despite the onset of Islam. Talking from his personal experience, he said Islam was taught to him in a superficial and ritualistic manner. Only the fundamentals in Islam like prayers, recitation of the Quran, memorizing the 20 trails of God ('sifat dua puluh'), ablutions, and fasting were taught. Even so, learning was by rote and memorization, neither understanding the meaning nor the rationale underlying each injunction.

Tok Hamid also points out the lack of mass media facilities like television and radio as the probable cause for the prevalence of keramat worship in his time. In his opinion, such a situation allowed information and religious education to be disseminated secretly. Given the trustfulness of the Malay folks in those days, Tok Hamid attests that people were easily taken in by stories or lessons that were taught to them, regardless of the person's credibility or authenticity of the story.

Tok Hamid no long practises keramat worship now because "through time, with the presence of our religious teachers who were educated in Islamic universities aboard, there is more meaningful dissemination of the religion. I too began to realize that keramat worship is against the teaching of Islam."

 
SPI in Keramat Radin Mas


Islamic injunction on keramat worship

The act of keramat worship, in the eyes of Islam, is 'syirik'. It transgresses the most fundamental element in Islam, as it involves deifying and recognizing another power alongside Allah. 'Syirik' originates from an Arabic word 'Shrik', which means "association". In this case, it is the "association of something with God, other than God Himself" (Glasse 1989:370). 'Syirik' is the only act which cannot be forgiven by Allah, as it denies the unity of God Himself. As is clearly stated in the Holy Quran (4:116):

Allah forgiveth not (the sin of) joining other gods with Him; but He forgiveth whom He pleaseth other sins than this: one who joins other gods with Allah, hath strayed far, far away from the right path.

'Syirik' also connotes idolatry, which is "the act of associating with God other beings and objects, or that of setting up partners to Him" (Mustansir Mir 1987:99). One of the major sins in Islam is also considered to be the most heinous:

Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with him; to set up partners with Allah is to devise a sin most heinous indeed (Al-Quaran 4:48).

Islamic injunctions regarding the worshipping of anything else besides Allah is distinctly clear. Keramat worship is evidently one of the many forms of 'syrik' practiced among Muslims today.

According to a recent report by the Department of Malay Studies, NUS, Singapore, a survey on the status, functions and significance of keramat worship among the contemporary Singapore Malays is made. Thirty questionnaires were given to the respondents between 30 and 45 years old. This age group best represents the younger generation of Malays who are exposed to education, both religious and secular, and are more affected by the encroachment of urbanization and modern technology. Furthermore, this generation of Malays would allow us to make a prediction on the future position of keramat worship among the Malay community in Singapore.

In investigating the level of awareness regarding the incompatibility of keramat worship with Islam, three questions were put forth. In the first question, the respondents were asked: In your opinion, is keramat worship against the teaching of Islam? The response is as follow:

The respondents were then asked the second question: If yes, indicate why. Alternatively, the respondents were asked: If no, is any of the following your reason why? (a) It is part of Malay culture; (b) It solves my problem; (c) No one has said the practice is wrong.

None of the male respondents responded to this question. This is in line with their earlier response since more than 86% of them indicated positively that keramat worship is against the teaching of Islam. In contrast, all of the 15 females respondents indicated that "no one has said that keramat worship is wrong." This is uncalled for since all of them had already responded to the second question in the affirmative. Notwithstanding that, if no one had told them that it was wrong to worship the keramat, one wonders how they knew that the act of keramat worship is 'syirik': that it is a form of superstition; that it incurs the wrath of Allah; that it is against the concept of 'tauhid'. Whatever may be the contradictions, the survey does show that the young Malay Singaporeans are generally aware of the incompatibility of keramat worship with Islam.

To investigate the relevance of keramat among the Malay community today, the respondents were asked to indicate whether they would visit a keramat, a bomoh, or a medical doctor for the following problems: a child is sick, plan for a long journey, applying for a new job, being anxious over uncontrollable situation, infertility, lack of spiritual strength, martial problem, and aspiring for success. The response of the male and female respondents is given below:

 Where would male respondents turn to for consultation on personal problems?




 Where would female respondents turn to for consultation on personal problems?


The 'bomoh' or 'dukun', as compared to the keramat, occupies a more significant position among Malay men although both the bomoh and the keramat have somewhat similar levels of significance and functions among the Malay women. Modern doctor is generally more popular than the keramat among the Malays. The young Malay Singaporeans now turn increasingly to modern doctors, and not to the keramat, especially in areas where the keramat used to be an important source of assistance for the Malays, for instance, in solving problems of infertility or illness.


Conclusion

Though belief in keramat prevails among the Malays in Singapore, the phenomenon of 'keramat worship' is at best obsolete today. Belief in it still prevails, perhaps, because the Malay community's religious world-view has provided a firm foundation for its acceptance in Islam. More importantly is the Islamic sanction on the ideas of keramat and 'tawassul' that allows the Malay community to retain such beliefs till today.

The survey has revealed that the keramat no longer occupies a significant position in Malay society. Islamic awareness on the incompatibility of keramat worship is the direct cause of it. One may ask why the keramat has lost its significance even when Islam allows some forum of intercession. An answer which comes to mind is that the Malays today, given their greater exposure to Islam, would rather disassociate themselves completely from the idea of keramat for fear that their acts, if done wrongly, may have a tinge of worshipping in it. Moreover, requesting directly from God is strongly encouraged in Islam as it is part of Muslim faith that "Allah is enough for a Protector, and Allah is enough for a Helper" (Al-Quran 4:45).

As pointed out earlier in the introduction, what is practiced by some Malays who visit the keramat today is not 'keramat worship' but rather 'keramat veneration'. As the concept of 'ibadah' (performing something to gain blessings from God) in Islam is very broad, this form of veneration is also considered one of the ways in which one gets closer to God and gains His blessings.

Besides the veneration of keramat places, there is also the retention of beleif in keramat objects. Things derived from someone venerable like stones, strings and water are still conceived to have the ability to avert one from calamitous situations or contain healing power. The 'bomoh' or 'dukun', as seen in the survey, still has some significance to the Malays here. In fact, some 'bomoh' are still revered as 'kermat hidup' (living saints) by those who have benefited from them. However, reverence for the 'bomoh' does not extend to worship. Indeed, such reverence is often based on the conviction that God has chosen and blessed them with some power which others are not fortunate to have. Likewise, for keramat objects, it is the belief that God's omnipotence enables inanimate objects to have powers not possessed by normal human beings. Hence, on occasions where doctors are felt to be ineffective, such forms of keramat are resorted to by the Malays, as it is believed that the keramat relates to both the material and the spiritual worlds.

Malays have now gained a better understanding of their religion and are more sensitive to it. With education, greater exposure to Islam and the presence of learned religious leaders, there is greater appreciation, observance, and respect for religious injunctions which go beyond the ritualistic aspects of the religion.

 
This is a typical scenario of keramat worship where devotees come and pay homage to the Muslim saints at their resting place


Reference

Braddron Asiqin Basir. 1988. Kerpercayaan dan Amalan Tradisional Yang Berkaitan Dengan Keramat: Kajian Kes di Langkawi, Kedah. B.A. Honours Academic Exercise, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, National University of Malaysia

Glasse 1989:370, The Concise Encyclopedia of Islam. London: Stacy International, 1989

Greetz, Clifford. 1971. Agricultural Involution: Processes of Ecological Change in Indonesia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ismal hanapiah. 1990. Jentayu: Langkawi Sepintas lalu. Ulu Malacca: Pancang Perak Enterprise

Mohd Nor Bin Ngah,. 1985. Islamic World-view of Man, Society and Nature among the Malays in Malaysia, pp.6-45. In Malaysian World-view. Ed. Mohd Taib Osman. Singapore: institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Mohd Taib bin Osman. Malay Folk Beliefs: An Integration of Disparate Elements. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1989

Mustansir Mir 1987:99, Dictionary of Quranic Terms and Concepts. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. 1987

Skeat, Walter William. Malay Magic. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.

Serjeant, R.B. 1981. Hud and Other Pre-Islamic Prophets of hadramawt, pp.1210179. In Studies in Arabian History and Civilization. London: Variorum Reprints.

Subhan John A., 1960:334, Sufism: Its Saints and Shrines: An Introduction to the Study of Sufism with Special Reference to India and Pakistan. Lucknow: Locknow Publishing House, 1960.

Subhan, John A. 1960. Sufism: Its Saints and Shrines. Lucknow: Lucknow Publishing House.

Winstedt, R.O. 1924. Karamat: Sacred Places and Persons in Malaya. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. 2. pt. 3, pp.264-279

Winstedt, R.O. 1925. Shaman, Saiva and Sufi: A Study of the Evolution of Malay Magic. London: Constable.

Note:

Majority of the respondents had received a substantial level of education. About 2/3 of the males had obtained secondary school education, while 1/3 had reached the post-secondary level. Among the females, more than 86% received secondary education, more than 6% reached post-secondary level, and more than 6% had no formal education.

Respondents were asked to classify themselves into four categories: devout Muslims, staunch Muslim, moderate Muslim, and nominal Muslim. Majority (86.7%) of male respondents categorise themselves as "moderate Muslims" while the remaining 13.3% consider themselves as staunch Muslims. None of them categorise themselves as devout Muslims or nominal Muslims. Majority (80%) of the female respondents consider themselves as moderate Muslims, 13.3% as devout Muslims, and 6.7% as nominal Muslims. None of them categorise themselves as staunch Muslims.

¡@

`


Main Menu
Table of Content
<< Previous 1 2 3

Should you have any comment about this SPI Investigation, we would like to hear from you by email.
¡@

All the photos are the property of SPI.  Illegal copying is strictly prohibited.
Published by Singapore Paranormal Investigators
All rights reserved (C) 2002-2005 www.spi.com.sg