|
Negative Energy,
Wormholes and Warp Drive |
|
|
|
Negative Energy, Wormholes and Warp
Drive
by
Lawrence H. Ford and Thomas A. Roman
Scientific American, January
2000
The construction of worm holes and warp drive
would require a very unusual form of energy. Unfortunately,
the same laws of physics that allow the existence of
this "negative energy" also appear to limit its
behavior

|
If a wormhole could exist, it would appear as a
spherical opening to an otherwise distant part of the
cosmos. In this doctored photograph of Times Square, the
wormhole allows New Yorkers to walk to the Sahara with a
single step, rather than spending hours on the plane to
Tamanrasset. although such a wormhole does not break any
known laws of physics, it would require the production
of unrealistic amounts of negative
energy. |
Can a region of space contain less than
nothing? Common sense would say no; the most one could do is
remove all matter and radiation and be left with vacuum. But
quantum physics has a proven ability to confound intuition,
and this case is no exception. A region of space, it turns
out, can contain less than nothing. Its energy per unit
volume–the energy density–can be less than
zero.
Needless to say, the implications are bizarre.
According to Einstein's theory of gravity, general relativity,
the presence of matter and energy warps the geometric fabric
of space and time. What we perceive as gravity is the
space-time distortion produced by normal, positive energy or
mass. But when negative energy or mass–so-called exotic
matter–bends space-time, all sorts of amazing phenomena might
become possible: traversable wormholes, which could act as
tunnels to otherwise distant parts of the universe; warp
drive, which would allow for faster-than-light travel; and
time machines, which might permit journeys into the past.
Negative energy could even be used to make perpetual-motion
machines or to destroy black holes. A Star Trek episode
could not ask for more.
For physicists, these
ramifications set off alarm bells. The potential paradoxes of
backward time travel–such as killing your grandfather before
your father is conceived–have long been explored in science
fiction, and the other consequences of exotic matter are also
problematic. They raise a question of fundamental importance:
Do the laws of physics that permit negative energy place any
limits on its behavior? We and others have discovered that
nature imposes stringent constraints on the magnitude and
duration of negative energy, which (unfortunately, some would
say) appear to render the construction of wormholes and warp
drives very unlikely.
Double
Negative
Before proceeding further, we should draw
the reader's attention to what negative energy is not. It
should not be confused with antimatter, which has positive
energy. When an electron and its antiparticle, a positron,
collide, they annihilate. The end products are gamma rays,
which carry positive energy. If antiparticles were composed of
negative energy, such an interaction would result in a final
energy of zero. One should also not confuse negative energy
with the energy associated with the cosmological constant,
postulated in inflationary models of the universe [see
"Cosmological Antigravity, by Lawrence M. Krauss; SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN, January 1999]. Such a constant represents negative
pressure but positive energy. (Some authors call this exotic
matter; we reserve the term for negative energy
densities.)
The concept of negative energy is not pure
fantasy; some of its effects have even been produced in the
laboratory. They arise from Heisenberg's uncertainty
principle, which requires that the energy density of any
electric, magnetic or other field fluctuate randomly. Even
when the energy density is zero on average, as in a vacuum, it
fluctuates. Thus, the quantum vacuum can never remain empty in
the classical sense of the term; it is a roiling sea of
"virtual" particles spontaneously popping in and out of
existence [see "Exploiting Zero-Point Energy," by Philip Yam;
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, December 1997]. In quantum theory, the
usual notion of zero energy corresponds to the vacuum with all
these fluctuations. So if one can somehow contrive to dampen
the undulations, the vacuum will have less energy than it
normally does–that is, less than zero energy.

|
Waves of light ordinarily have a positive or zero
energy density at different points in space (top).
But in a so-called squeezed state, the energy
density at a particular instant in time can become
negative at some locations (bottom). To
compensate, the peak positive density must
increase. |
As an example, researchers in quantum optics
have created special states of fields in which destructive
quantum interference suppresses the vacuum fluctuations. These
so-called squeezed vacuum states involve negative energy. More
precisely, they are associated with regions of alternating
positive and negative energy. The total energy averaged over
all space remains positive; squeezing the vacuum creates
negative energy in one place at the price of extra positive
energy elsewhere. A typical experiment involves laser beams
passing through nonlinear optical materials [see "Squeezed
Light," by Richart E. Slusher and Bernard Yurke; SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN, May 1988]. The intense laser light induces the
material to create pairs of light quanta, photons. These
photons alternately enhance and suppress the vacuum
fluctuations, leading to regions of positive and negative
energy, respectively.
Another method for producing
negative energy introduces geometric boundaries into a space.
In 1948 Dutch physicist Hendrik B. G. Casimir showed that two
uncharged parallel metal plates alter the vacuum fluctuations
in such a way as to attract each other. The energy density
between the plates was later calculated to be negative. In
effect, the plates reduce the fluctuations in the gap between
them; this creates negative energy and pressure, which pulls
the plates together. The narrower the gap, the more negative
the energy and pressure, and the stronger is the attractive
force. The Casimir effect has recently been measured by Steve
K. Lamoreaux of Los Alamos National Laboratory and by Umar
Mohideen of the University of California at Riverside and his
colleague Anushree Roy. Similarly, in the 1970s Paul C. W.
Davies and Stephen A. Fulling, then at King's College at the
University of London, predicted that a moving boundary, such
as a moving mirror, could produce a flux of negative
energy.
For both the Casimir effect and squeezed
states, researchers have measured only the indirect effects of
negative energy. Direct detection is more difficult but might
be possible using atomic spins, as Peter G. Grove, then at the
British Home Office, Adrian C. Ottewill, then at the
University of Oxford, and one of us (Ford) suggested in
1992.
Gravity and Levity
The concept
of negative energy arises in several areas of modern physics.
It has an intimate link with black holes, those mysterious
objects whose gravitational field is so strong that nothing
can escape from within their boundary, the event horizon. In
1974 Stephen W. Hawking of the University of Cambridge made
his famous prediction that black holes evaporate by emitting
radiation [see "The Quantum Mechanics of Black Holes," by
Stephen W. Hawking; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, January 1977]. A
black hole radiates energy at a rate inversely proportional to
the square of its mass. Although the evaporation rate is large
only for subatomic size black holes, it provides a crucial
link between the laws of black holes and the laws of
thermodynamics. The Hawking radiation allows black holes to
come into thermal equilibrium with their
environment.
At first glance, evaporation leads to a
contradiction. The horizon is a one-way street; energy can
only flow inward. So how can a black hole radiate energy
outward? Because energy must be conserved, the production of
positive energy - which distant observers see as the Hawking
radiation–is accompanied by a flow of negative energy into the
hole. Here the negative energy is produced by the extreme
space-time curvature near the hole, which disturbs the vacuum
fluctuations. In this way, negative energy is required for the
consistency of the unification of black hole physics with
thermodynamics.
The black hole is not the only curved
region of space-time where negative energy seems to play a
role. Another is the worm hole - a hypothesized type of tunnel
that connects one region of space and time to another.
Physicists used to think that wormholes exist only on the very
finest length scales, bubbling in and out of existence like
virtual particles [see "Quantum Gravity, by Bryce S. DeWitt;
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, December 1983]. In the early 1960s
physicists Robert Fuller and John A. Wheeler showed that
larger wormholes would collapse under their own gravity so
rapidly that even a beam of light would not have enough time
to travel through them.
But in the late 1980s various
researchers - notably Michael S. Morris and Kip S. Thorne of
the
California Institute of Technology and Matt Visser
of Washington University - found otherwise. Certain wormholes
could in fact be made large enough for a person or spaceship.
Someone might enter the mouth of a wormhole stationed on
Earth, walk a short distance inside the wormhole and exit the
other mouth in, say, the Andromeda galaxy. The catch is that
traversable wormholes require negative energy. Because
negative energy is gravitationally repulsive, it would prevent
the wormhole from collapsing.
For a wormhole to be
traversable, it ought to (at bare minimum) allow signals, in
the form of light rays, to pass through it. Light rays
entering one mouth of a wormhole are converging, but to emerge
from the other mouth, they must defocus - in other words, they
must go from converging to diverging somewhere in between
[see illustration below]. This defocusing requires
negative energy. Whereas the curvature of space produced by
the attractive gravitational field of ordinary matter acts
like a converging lens, negative energy acts like a diverging
lens.

|
Waves of light ordinarily have a positive or zero
energy density at different points in space (top).
But in a so-called squeezed state, the energy
density at a particular instant in time can become
negative at some locations (bottom). To
compensate, the peak positive density must
increase. |
No Dilithium Needed
Such space-time contortions
would enable another staple of science fiction as well:
faster-than-light travel. In 1994 Miguel Alcubierre Moya, then
at the University of Wales at Cardiff, discovered a solution
to Einstein's equations that has many of the desired features
of warp drive. It describes a space-time bubble that
transports a starship at arbitrarily high speeds relative to
observers outside the bubble. Calculations show that negative
energy is required.
Warp drive might appear to violate
Einstein's special theory of relativity. But special
relativity says that you cannot outrun a light signal in a
fair race in which you and the signal follow the same route.
When space-time is warped, it might be possible to beat a
light signal by taking a different route, a shortcut. The
contraction of space-time in front of the bubble and the
expansion behind it create such a shortcut [see
illustration below].

| Space-time
bubble is the closest that modern physics comes to the
"warp drive" of science fiction. It can convey a
starship at arbitrarily high speeds. Space-time
contracts at the front of the bubble, reducing the
distance to the destination, and expands at its rear,
increasing the distance from the origin (arrows).
The ship itself stands still relative to the space
immediately around it; crew members do not experience
any acceleration. Negative energy (blue) is
required on the sides of the
bubble. |
One problem with Alcubierre's original model,
pointed out by Sergei V. Krasnikov of the Central Astronomical
Observatory at Pulkovo near St. Petersburg, is that the
interior of the warp bubble is causally disconnected from its
forward edge. A starship captain on the inside cannot steer
the bubble or turn it on or off; some external agency must set
it up ahead of time. To get around this problem, Krasnikov
proposed a "superluminal subway," a tube of modified
space-time (not the same as a wormhole) connecting Earth and a
distant star. Within the tube, superluminal travel in one
direction is possible. During the outbound journey at sublight
speed, a spaceship crew would create such a tube. On the
return journey, they could travel through it at warp speed.
Like warp bubbles, the subway involves negative energy. It has
since been shown by Ken D. Olum of Tufts University and by
Visser, together with Bruce Bassett of Oxford and Stefano
Liberati of the International School for Advanced Studies in
Trieste, that any scheme for
faster-than-light travel
requires the use of negative energy.
If one can
construct wormholes or warp drives, time travel might become
possible. The passage of time is relative; it depends on the
observer's velocity. A person who leaves Earth in a spaceship,
travels at near lightspeed and returns will have aged less
than someone who remains on Earth. If the traveler manages to
outrun a light ray, perhaps by taking a shortcut through a
wormhole or a warp bubble, he may return before he left.
Morris, Thorne and Ulvi Yurtsever, then at Caltech, proposed a
wormhole time machine in 1988, and their paper has stimulated
much research on time travel over the past decade. In 1992
Hawking proved that any construction of a time machine in a
finite region of space-time inherently requires negative
energy.

| View from the
bridge of a faster-than-light starship as it heads in
the direction of the Little Dipper (above) looks
nothing like the star streaks typically depicted in
science fiction.
|

| As the
velocity increases, stars ahead of the ship (left
column) appear ever closer to the direction of
motion and turn bluer in color. Behind the ship
(right column), stars shift closer to a position
directly astern, redden and eventually disappear from
view altogether. The light from stars directly overhead
or underneath remains
unaffected. |
Negative energy is so strange that one might
think it must violate some law of physics. Before and after
the creation of equal amounts of negative and positive energy
in previously empty space, the total energy is zero, so the
law of conservation of energy is obeyed. But there are many
phenomena that conserve energy yet never occur in the real
world. A broken glass does not reassemble itself, and heat
does not spontaneously flow from a colder to a hotter body.
Such effects are forbidden by the second law of
thermodynamics. This general principle states that the degree
of disorder of a system–its entropy–cannot decrease on its own
without an input of energy. Thus, a refrigerator, which pumps
heat from its cold interior to the warmer outside room,
requires an external power source. Similarly, the second law
also forbids the complete conversion of heat into
work.
Negative energy potentially conflicts with the
second law. Imagine an exotic laser, which creates a steady
outgoing beam of negative energy. Conservation of energy
requires that a byproduct be a steady stream of positive
energy. One could direct the negative energy beam off to some
distant corner of the universe, while employing the positive
energy to perform useful work. This seemingly inexhaustible
energy supply could be used to make a perpetual-motion machine
and thereby violate the second law. If the beam were directed
at a glass of water, it could cool the water while using the
extracted positive energy to power a small motor–providing a
refrigerator with no need for external power. These problems
arise not from the existence of negative energy per se but
from the unrestricted separation of negative and positive
energy.
Unfettered negative energy would also have
profound consequences for black holes. When a black hole forms
by the collapse of a dying star, general relativity predicts
the formation of a singularity, a region where the
gravitational field becomes infinitely strong. At this point,
general relativity–and indeed all known laws of physics–are
unable to say what happens next. This inability is a profound
failure of the current mathematical description of nature. So
long as the singularity is hidden within an event horizon,
however, the damage is limited. The description of nature
everywhere outside of the horizon is unaffected. For this
reason, Roger Penrose of Oxford proposed the cosmic censorship
hypothesis: there can be no naked singularities, which are
unshielded by event horizons.
For special types of
charged or rotating black holes– known as extreme black
holes–even a small increase in charge or spin, or a decrease
in mass, could in principle destroy the horizon and convert
the hole into a naked singularity. Attempts to charge up or
spin up these black holes using ordinary matter seem to fail
for a variety of reasons. One might instead envision producing
a decrease in mass by shining a beam of negative energy down
the hole, without altering its charge or spin, thus subverting
cosmic censorship. One might create such a beam, for example,
using a moving mirror. In principle, it would require only a
tiny amount of negative energy to produce a dramatic change in
the state of an extreme black hole. Therefore, this might be
the scenario in which negative energy is the most likely to
produce macroscopic effects.
Not Separate and
Not Equal
Fortunately (or not, depending on your
point of view), although quantum theory allows the existence
of negative energy, it also appears to place strong
restrictions - known as quantum inequalities - on its
magnitude and duration. These inequalities were first
suggested by Ford in 1978. Over the past decade they have been
proved and refined by us and others, including Eanna E.
Flanagan of Cornell University, Michael J. Pfenning, then at
Tufts, Christopher J. Fewster and Simon P. Eveson of the
University of York, and Edward Teo of the National University
of Singapore.
The inequalities bear some resemblance to
the uncertainty principle. They say that a beam of negative
energy cannot be arbitrarily intense for an arbitrarily long
time. The permissible magnitude of the negative energy is
inversely related to its temporal or spatial extent. An
intense pulse of negative energy can last for a short time; a
weak pulse can last longer. Furthermore, an initial negative
energy pulse must be followed by a larger pulse of positive
energy [see illustration below]. The larger the
magnitude of the negative energy, the nearer must be its
positive energy counterpart. These restrictions are
independent of the details of how the negative energy is
produced. One can think of negative energy as an energy loan.
Just as a debt is negative money that has to be repaid,
negative energy is an energy deficit. As we will discuss
below, the analogy goes even further.

|
Pulses of negative energy are permitted by
quantum theory but only under three conditions. First,
the longer the pulse lasts, the weaker it must be (a,
b). Second, a pulse of positive energy must follow. The
magnitude of the positive pulse must exceed that of the
initial negative one. Third, the longer the time
interval between the two pulses, the larger the positive
one must be - an effect known as quantum interest
(c). |
In the Casimir effect, the negative energy
density between the plates can persist indefinitely, but large
negative energy densities require a very small plate
separation. The magnitude of the negative energy density is
inversely proportional to the fourth power of the plate
separation. Just as a pulse with a very negative energy
density is limited in time, very negative Casimir energy
density must be confined between closely spaced plates.
According to the quantum inequalities, the energy density in
the gap can be made more negative than the Casimir value, but
only temporarily. In effect, the more one tries to depress the
energy density below the Casimir value, the shorter the time
over which this situation can be maintained.
When
applied to wormholes and warp drives, the quantum inequalities
typically imply that such structures must either be limited to
submicroscopic sizes, or if they are macroscopic the negative
energy must be confined to incredibly thin bands. In 1996 we
showed that a submicroscopic wormhole would have a throat
radius of no more than about 10-32 meter. This is
only slightly larger than the Planck length, 10-35
meter, the smallest distance that has definite meaning. We
found that it is possible to have models of wormholes of
macroscopic size but only at the price of confining the
negative energy to an extremely thin band around the throat.
For example, in one model a throat radius of 1 meter requires
the negative energy to be a band no thicker than
10-21 meter, a millionth the size of a proton.
Visser has estimated that the negative energy required for
this size of wormhole has a magnitude equivalent to the total
energy generated by 10 billion stars in one year. The
situation does not improve much for larger wormholes. For the
same model, the maximum allowed thickness of the negative
energy band is proportional to the cube root of the throat
radius. Even if the throat radius is increased to a size of
one light-year, the negative energy must still be confined to
a region smaller than a proton radius, and the total amount
required increases linearly with the throat size.
It
seems that wormhole engineers face daunting problems. They
must find a mechanism for confining large amounts of negative
energy to extremely thin volumes. So-called cosmic strings,
hypothesized in some cosmological theories, involve very large
energy densities in long, narrow lines. But all known
physically reasonable cosmic-string models have positive
energy densities.
Warp drives are even more tightly
constrained, as shown by Pfenning and Allen Everett of Tufts,
working with us. In Alcubierre's model, a warp bubble
traveling at 10 times lightspeed (warp factor 2, in the
parlance of Star Trek: The Next Generation) must have a
wall thickness of no more than 10-32 meter. A bubble large
enough to enclose a starship 200 meters across would require a
total amount of negative energy equal to 10 billion times the
mass of the observable universe. Similar constraints apply to
Krasnikov's superluminal subway. A modification of
Alcubierre's model was recently constructed by Chris Van Den
Broeck of the Catholic University of Louvain in Belgium. It
requires much less negative energy but places the starship in
a curved space-time bottle whose neck is about 10-32 meter
across, a difficult feat. These results would seem to make it
rather unlikely that one could construct wormholes and warp
drives using negative energy generated by quantum
effects.
Cosmic Flashing and Quantum
Interest
The quantum inequalities prevent
violations of the second law. If one tries to use a pulse of
negative energy to cool a hot object, it will be quickly
followed by a larger pulse of positive energy, which reheats
the object. A weak pulse of negative energy could remain
separated from its positive counterpart for a longer time, but
its effects would be indistinguishable from normal thermal
fluctuations. Attempts to capture or split off negative energy
from positive energy also appear to fail. One might intercept
an energy beam, say, by using a box with a shutter. By closing
the shutter, one might hope to trap a pulse of negative energy
before the offsetting positive energy arrives. But the very
act of closing the shutter creates an energy flux that cancels
out the negative energy it was designed to trap [see
illustration below].

|
Attempt to circumvent the quantum laws that
govern negative energy inevitably ends in
disappointment. The experimenter intends to detach a
negative energy pulse from its compensating positive
energy pulse. As the pulses approach a box (a), the
experimenter tries to isolate the negative one by
closing the lid after it has entered (b). Yet the very
act of closing the lid creates a second positive energy
pulse inside the box
(c). |
We have shown that there are similar
restrictions on violations of cosmic censorship. A pulse of
negative energy injected into a charged black hole might
momentarily destroy the horizon, exposing the singularity
within. But the pulse must be followed by a pulse of positive
energy, which would convert the naked singularity back into a
black hole - a scenario we have dubbed cosmic flashing. The
best chance to observe cosmic flashing would be to maximize
the time separation between the negative and positive energy,
allowing the naked singularity to last as long as possible.
But then the magnitude of the negative energy pulse would have
to be very small, according to the quantum inequalities. The
change in the mass of the black hole caused by the negative
energy pulse will get washed out by the normal quantum
fluctuations in the hole's mass, which are a natural
consequence of the uncertainty principle. The view of the
naked singularity would thus be blurred, so a distant observer
could not unambiguously verify that cosmic censorship had been
violated.
Recently we, and also Frans Pretorius, then
at the University of Victoria, and Fewster and Teo, have shown
that the quantum inequalities lead to even stronger bounds on
negative energy. The positive pulse that necessarily follows
an initial negative pulse must do more than compensate for the
negative pulse; it must overcompensate. The amount of
overcompensation increases with the time interval between the
pulses. Therefore, the negative and positive pulses can never
be made to exactly cancel each other. The positive energy must
always dominate–an effect known as quantum interest. If
negative energy is thought of as an energy loan, the loan must
be repaid with interest. The longer the loan period or the
larger the loan amount, the greater is the interest.
Furthermore, the larger the loan, the smaller is the maximum
allowed loan period. Nature is a shrewd banker and always
calls in its debts.
The concept of negative energy
touches on many areas of physics: gravitation, quantum theory,
thermodynamics. The interweaving of so many different parts of
physics illustrates the tight logical structure of the laws of
nature. On the one hand, negative energy seems to be required
to reconcile black holes with thermodynamics. On the other,
quantum physics prevents unrestricted production of negative
energy, which would violate the second law of thermodynamics.
Whether these restrictions are also features of some deeper
underlying theory, such as quantum gravity, remains to be
seen. Nature no doubt has more surprises in
store.
The Authors
Lawrence H. Ford
and Thomas A. Roman have collaborated on negative energy
issues for over a decade. Ford received his Ph.D. from
Princeton University in 1974, working under John Wheeler, one
of the founders of black hole physics. He is now a professor
of physics at Tufts University and works on problems in both
general relativity and quantum theory, with a special interest
in quantum fluctuations. His other pursuits include hiking in
the New England woods and gathering wild mushrooms. Roman
received his Ph.D. in 1981 from Syracuse University under
Peter Bergmann, who collaborated with Albert Einstein on
unified field theory. Roman has been a frequent visitor at the
Tufts Institute of Cosmology during the past 10 years and is
currently a professor of physics at Central Connecticut State
University. His interests include the implications of negative
energy for a quantum theory of gravity. He tends to avoid wild
mushrooms.
Further Information
- BLACK HOLES AND TIME WARPS: EINSTEIN'S OUTRAGEOUS
LEGACY.
Kip S. Thorne. W. W. Norton, 1994.
- LORENTZIAN WORMHOLES: FROM EINSTEIN TO HAWKING.
Matt
Visser. American Institute of Physics Press, 1996.
- QUANTUM FIELD THEORY CONSTRAINS TRAVERSABLE WORMHOLE
GEOMETRIES.
L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman in Physical
Review D, Vol. 53, No. 10, pages 5496-5507; May 15,
1996. Available at xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9510071 on the
World Wide Web.
- THE UNPHYSICAL NATURE OF WARP DRIVE.
M. J. Pfenning
and L. H. Ford in Classical and Quantum Gravity, Vol.
14, No. 7, pages 1743-1751; July 1997. Available at
xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9702026 on the World Wide Web.
- PARADOX LOST.
Paul Davies in New Scientist, Vol.
157, No. 2126, page 26; March 21, 1998.
- TIME MACHINES: TIME TRAVEL IN PHYSICS, METAPHYSICS, AND
SCIENCE FICTION.
Paul J. Nahin. AIP Press,
Springer-Verlag, 1999 second edition.
- THE QUANTUM INTEREST CONJECTURE.
L. H. Ford and T. A.
Roman in Physical Review D, Vol. 60, No. 10, Article
No. 104018 (8 pages); November 15, 1999. Available at
xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9901074 on the World Wide Web.
|
Main Menu
Should you have any comment about this SPI Article, we would
like to hear from you by mail. |